Also, Ethan, I hope you're familiar with the reason why there is no range() support for floats currently? (Briefly, things like range(0.0, 0.8, step=0.1) could include or exclude the end point depending on rounding, which makes for troublesome semantics.)
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> wrote: > 2011/9/23 Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us>: >> A question came up on StackOverflow about range objects and floating point >> numbers. I thought about writing an frange that did for floats what range >> does for ints, so started examining the range class. I noticed it has >> __le__, __lt__, __eq__, __ne__, __ge__, and __gt__ methods. Some >> experiments show that xrange in 2.x does indeed implement those operations, >> but in 3.x range does not (TypeError: unorderable types: range() > range()). >> >> Was this intentional, or should I file a bug report? (I was unable to find >> anything in the What's New documents; also, I did not test in 3.0, just in >> 2.7, 3.1, 3.2.) > > That's simply a consequence of everything having comparisons defined > in 2.x. The comparison is essentially meaningless. > > > -- > Regards, > Benjamin > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com