On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 15:00:01 +0200 Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@haypocalc.com> wrote: > > > I don't understand why StringIO couldn't simply be optimized a little > > more, if it needs to. > > Honestly, I didn't know that StringIO.write() is more efficient than > str+=str, > and it is surprising to use the io module (which is supposed to be related to > files) to manipulate strings.
StringIO is an in-memory file-like object, like in 2.x (where it lived in the "cStringIO" module). I don't think it's a novel thing. > The PEP 393 uses one memory block, you cannot resize a str object anymore. I don't know why you're saying that. The concatenation optimization worked in 2.x where the "str" type also used only one memory block. You just have to check that the refcount is about to drop to zero. Of course, resizing only works if the two unicode objects are of the same "kind". Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
