On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote: > On Oct 06, 2011, at 06:04 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >>On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:02:05 -0400 >>Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote: >>> >>> >The first part is implemented in CPython; the second part needs a module >>> >name to replace virtualenv. python -m pythonv doesn’t seem right. >>> >>> Nope, although `python -m virtualize` seems about perfect. >> >>`python -m sandbox` ? > > That's nice too.
sandbox is a bit close to Victor's pysandbox for restricted execution environments. 'nest' would probably work, although I don't recall the 'egg' nomenclature featuring heavily in the current zipimport or packaging docs, so it may be a little obscure. 'pyenv' is another possible colour for the shed, although a quick Google search suggests that may have few name clash problems. 'appenv' would be yet another colour, since that focuses on the idea of 'environment per application'. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
