On 24/10/2011 11:46 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Mark Hammond<skippy.hamm...@gmail.com> wrote:
* The "magic" symbol is somewhat self-documenting - it implies a question.
Using --which adds another special case that people would need to
understand isn't passed to Python. IOW, I like that there is only 1 special
option and that one special option can be expressed in the form of a
question.
This may be a difference in what we're used to. To me, the "-?" is
strongly associated with "-h" and "--help"
Fair enough - and I admit to thinking -? didn't work for Python - but it
does!
, whereas "--which" maps directly to the *nix "which" command:
Sure, but this isn't for *nix, so I'm not sure it is safe to assume the
users of the launcher will make that association.
So I don't actually see any particularly *new* design decisions to be
made in relation to a "--which" option - it's just a workaround for
the lack of a native 'which' equivalent on Windows,
Actually I don't think that is true - even with a 'which' on Windows you
can't get this information from it. Indeed, this functionality is quite
distinct from that offered by which.
TBH I'm not that bothered - I just have a slight uneasiness to this new
special option which really just helps describe what a different special
option does.
So - in an effort to talk myself out of my idea... :) one advantage
--which would have is that it could work without any version qualifiers
at all - eg:
% py --which path/to/script.py
could also tell you what version of Python would be used to execute the
named script, taking into account the current defaults, environment
variables and shebang line found in the script.
Cheers,
Mark
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
