On 25 November 2011 15:07, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <amaur...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/11/25 Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> >> It would be nice to have the optimisation back if it's easy enough to >> do so, for quick-and-dirty code, but it is not a good idea to rely on >> it (and it's especially unwise to base benchmarks on it working :-)) > > Note that this string optimization hack is still present in Python 3, > but it now acts on *unicode* strings, not bytes.
Ah, yes. That makes sense. Paul _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com