On Dec 09, 2011, at 07:12 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >Isn't it basically just exposing a C level version of the unicode() >builtin's behaviour? While I agree the name could be better (and >PyUnicode_AsExactUnicode would certainly work), why make it private?
Don't we already have that in PyObject_Str(), or in Python 2, PyObject_Unicode()? -Barry _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
