On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:06:07 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:31 PM, <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: > > results for 12de1ad1cee8 on branch "default" > > -------------------------------------------- > > > > test_capi leaked [2008, 2008, 2008] references, sum=6024 > > Yikes, you weren't kidding about that new subinterpreter code > execution test upsetting the refleak detection...
Well, these are real leaks, but I expect them to be quite difficult to track (I've found a couple of them), because they can be scattered around in C module initialization routines and the like. I suggest we skip this test on refleak runs. cheers Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
