On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:10:51 +0000 Mark Shannon <m...@hotpy.org> wrote:
> On 16/02/12 20:45, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:18:14 +0000 > > Mark Shannon<m...@hotpy.org> wrote: > >> Proposed PEP for new dictionary implementation, PEP 410? > >> is attached. > >> > > > > So, I'm running a few benchmarks using Twisted's test suite > > (see https://bitbucket.org/pitrou/t3k/wiki/Home). > > > > At the end of `python -i bin/trial twisted.internet.test`: > > -> vanilla 3.3: RSS = 94 MB > > -> new dict: RSS = 91 MB > > > > At the end of `python -i bin/trial twisted.python.test`: > > -> vanilla 3.3: RSS = 31.5 MB > > -> new dict: RSS = 30 MB > > > > At the end of `python -i bin/trial twisted.conch.test`: > > -> vanilla 3.3: RSS = 68 MB > > -> new dict: RSS = 42 MB (!) > > > > At the end of `python -i bin/trial twisted.trial.test`: > > -> vanilla 3.3: RSS = 32 MB > > -> new dict: RSS = 30 MB > > > > At the end of `python -i bin/trial twisted.test`: > > -> vanilla 3.3: RSS = 62 MB > > -> new dict: RSS = 78 MB (!) > > In theory, new-dict should never use more a few kbs more than vanilla. > That looks like a serious leak. I'll investigate as soon as I get a chance. > Which revision of new-dict are you using? 6c4d5d9dfc6d Thanks :) Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
