On Feb 29, 2012, at 07:30 AM, Yury Selivanov wrote: >"""As it stands, Python 3 is currently a bad choice for long-term >investments, since the ecosystem is not yet properly developed, and >libraries are still fighting with their API decisions for Python 3.""" > >to: > >"""As it stands, when chosing between 2.7 and Python 3.2, Python 3 >is currently not the best choice for certain long-term investments, >since the ecosystem is not yet properly developed, and libraries are >still fighting with their API decisions for Python 3.""" > >Could you just remove the statement completely?
If I read correctly, Nick is undertaking a rewrite of PEP 414, which should help a lot. -Barry _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com