On Thursday 01 March 2012 14:07:10 Victor Stinner wrote:
> > Here are my real-world use cases. Not for security, but for safety and
> > performance reasons (I've built by own RODict and ROList modeled after
> > dictproxy):
> >
> > - Global, but immutable containers, e.g. as class members
>
> I attached type_final.patch to the issue #14162 to demonstrate how
> frozendict can be used to implement a "read-only" type. Last version:
> http://bugs.python.org/file24696/type_final.patch
Oh, hmm. I rather meant something like that:
"""
class Foo:
some_mapping = frozendict(
blah=1, blub=2
)
or as a variant:
def zonk(some_default=frozendict(...)):
...
or simply a global object:
baz = frozendict(some_immutable_mapping)
"""
I'm not sure about your final types. I'm using __slots__ = () for such things
(?)
nd
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
