On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:38, Brian Curtin <br...@python.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 14:13, Kenneth Reitz <m...@kennethreitz.com> wrote: > > I think the cheesehop trove classifiers would be the ideal way to > > agnostically link to a page of packages related to the standard package > in > > question. No need for sort order. > > Randomize the order for all I care. We still need to ensure we're > suggesting quality projects. It doesn't make sense for us to suggest > alternatives that we wouldn't want to use ourselves by just polling > some list that anyone can get on. > > This is documentation that receives hundreds of thousands of views a > month*. We need to be picky about what goes in it. > > > The beauty of this solution is that packages that aren't maintained won't > > add the appropriate classifier to their package, and therefore not show > up > > in the list. > > Just because it's maintained doesn't mean it's not garbage. I think we > really need to start every project off with a 0 and make them prove > that they're a 10. Just being active means nothing. > > > > * http://www.python.org/webstats/usage_201202.html#TOPURLS - I don't > know what page "Documentation" means since it doesn't have a specific > link, but whatever page that is got hit 960K times in February. > GroupURL /doc/* Documentation So it's anything that's in www.python.org/doc/. I don't believe it counts doc.python.org and docs.python.org. -- Thomas Wouters <tho...@python.org> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
