In http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/118024.html
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> What makes this "steady", given that it can be adjusted
> and it can go backwards?
It is best-effort for steady, but putting "best" in the name would
be an attractive nuisance.
> Is steady() merely a convenience function to avoid the user
> having to write something like this?
> try:
> mytimer = time.monotonic
> except AttributeError:
> mytimer = time.time
That would still be worth doing. But I think the main point is
that the clock *should* be monotonic, and *should* be as precise
as possible.
Given that it returns seconds elapsed (since an undefined start),
perhaps it should be
time.seconds()
or even
time.counter()
-jJ
--
If there are still threading problems with my replies, please
email me with details, so that I can try to resolve them. -jJ
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
