On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:25:20 -0700 Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote: > Georg Brandl wrote: > > On 25.03.2012 21:11, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > >> Georg Brandl wrote: > >> > >>> Thanks everyone for the overwhelmingly positive feedback. I've committed > >>> the > >>> new design to 3.2 and 3.3 for now, and it will be live for the 3.3 docs > >>> momentarily (3.2 isn't rebuilt at the moment until 3.2.3 final goes out). > >>> I'll transplant to 2.7 too, probably after the final release of 2.7.3. > >> I think it would be better to leave 2.7 with the old theme, to keep it > >> visually distinct from the nifty new theme used with the nifty new 3.2 and > >> 3.3 > >> versions. > > > > Hmm, -0 here. I'd like more opinions on this from other devs. > > +1 on keeping the 2.x and 3.x styles separate.
I don't really understand the point. If we want to distinguish between 2.x and 3.x, perhaps a lighter difference would suffice. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
