On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:34, Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Eli Bendersky <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I think the PEP is almost ready for approval. Congratulations! A few >>> comments: >>> >>> - I'd leave some wiggle room for the docs owner (Georg) about the >>> exact formulation of the text blurb included for provisional modules >>> and the glossary entry; I don't want the PEP to have the last word >>> here. >> >> Sure, Georg is free to modify the pep to amend the formulation if he wants >> to. > > Ok. He can do that at any time. :-) >
Georg, would you like to change the suggested phrasing in the PEP, or can I go on and add the "provisional package" term to the glossary (in 3.3 only, of course). Eli _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
