[resent since I accidentally dropped the list] Hi,
On 19 April 2012 15:55, Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote: > I'll make this change to the PEP. I'm not entirely sure the Yes/No examples > are great illustrations of this change in wording though. Here's the diff so > far (uncommitted): > > diff -r 34076bfed420 pep-0008.txt > --- a/pep-0008.txt Thu Apr 19 10:32:50 2012 +0200 > +++ b/pep-0008.txt Thu Apr 19 10:53:15 2012 -0400 > @@ -305,7 +305,11 @@ > ``>=``, ``in``, ``not in``, ``is``, ``is not``), Booleans (``and``, > ``or``, ``not``). > > -- Use spaces around arithmetic operators: > +- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding > + whitespace around the operators with the lowest priority(ies). This > + is very much to taste; however, never use more than one space, and > + always have the same amount of whitespace on both sides of a binary > + operator. While the text is certainly an improvement it seems to me that right now some of the examples following under the "No:" should be moved to "Yes:" """ No: i=i+1 submitted +=1 x = x*2 - 1 hypot2 = x*x + y*y c = (a+b) * (a-b) """ In particular "x = x*2 -1" and "hypot2 = x*x + y*y" sound like they should be under "Yes". Regards, Floris -- Debian GNU/Linux -- The Power of Freedom www.debian.org | www.gnu.org | www.kernel.org _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
