On Apr 25, 2012, at 11:31 PM, Eric Snow wrote: >The proposal of adding sys.implementation has come up a couple times >over the last few years. [1][2] While the reaction has been >overwhelmingly positive, nothing has come of it. I've created a >tracker issue and a patch: > > http://bugs.python.org/issue14673 > >The patch adds a struct sequence that holds ("name" => "CPython", >"version" => sys.version_info). If later needs dictate more fields, >we can cross that bridge then. > >Are there any objections? Considering the positive reaction and the >scope of the addition, does this need a PEP?
It's somewhat of a corner case, but I think a PEP couldn't hurt. The rationale section would be useful, at least. -Barry _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
