In http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/119134.html Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> I see PEP 418 gives time.clock_info() two boolean fields named > "is_monotonic" and "is_adjusted". I think the "is_" is unnecessary and > a bit ugly, and they could just be renamed "monotonic" and "adjusted". I agree with monotonic, but I think it should be "adjustable". To me, "adjusted" and "is_adjusted" both imply that an adjustment has already been made; "adjustable" only implies that it is possible. I do remember concerns (including Stephen J. Turnbull's <CAL_0O19nmi0+zB+tV8poZDAffNdTnohxo9y5dbw+E2q=9rx...@mail.gmail.com> ) that "adjustable" should imply at least a list of past adjustments, and preferably a way to make an adjustment. I just think that stating it is adjustable (without saying how, or whether and when it already happened) is less wrong than claiming it is already adjusted just in case it might have been. -jJ -- If there are still threading problems with my replies, please email me with details, so that I can try to resolve them. -jJ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
