> However, it's not my fault. I suggested `newlen < (PY_SSIZE_T_MAX - > PY_SSIZE_T_MAX / 5)` and not `newlen <= (PY_SSIZE_T_MAX - PY_SSIZE_T_MAX / > 5)`. In this case, there is no overflow.
Oh. I didn't understand why you replaced <= by <, and so I used <=. Anyway, I reverted the change for all reasons listed in this thread. Victor _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
