On May 09, 2012, at 08:51 AM, Eric Snow wrote: >The type for sys.implementation has slowly shifted from the original >proposal. At this point it's settled into where I think it will stay, >a custom type. I've covered the choice of type in the rationale >section. However, there may be merit in not being so specific about >the type. I'll give that some thought.
Right. See my previous follow up for what I think the PEP should say about the semantics of the type, without being so specific about the actual type. Cheers, -Barry _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
