On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: > On Thu, 10 May 2012 11:33:14 +1000 > Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The original concern (that sys.implementation may differ in length >> across implementations) has been eliminated by moving all >> implementation specific values into sys.implementation.metadata. > > Uh. It's scary the kind of things people sometimes come up with :-) > > sys.implementation.metadata looks like a completely over-engineered > concept. Please, let's just make sys.implementation a dict and stop > bothering about ordering and iterability.
Aye. Add a rule that all implementation specific (i.e. not defined in the PEP) keys must be prefixed with an underscore and I'm sold. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
