On Mon, 21 May 2012 12:03:31 -0400 Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: > On 5/21/2012 3:24 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > > docs.python.org/latest > > docs.python.org/dev > > docs.python.org/3.2 > > docs.python.org/3.1 > > docs.python.org/2.7 > > docs.python.org/2.6 > > etc... > > This looks great except for 'latest', which is ambiguous and awkward. > > Like Guido, I would have docs2 and docs3 link to the latest of each > series. This gives both series equal billing. docs itself could then > become a *neutral* index page. In retrospect, I wish we had done this a > year ago.
I don't like docs2/docs3. First, they are clumsy to type and look awkward. Second, it's not the right level of segregation; if you wanted separate domains you'd really want docs.python2.org and docs.python3.org. So, in the end, I think the current scheme is ok and we only need to add a "/stable" pointing to latest 3.x. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
