On 5/22/2012 2:37 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Okay, I've been convinced that keeping the dynamic path feature is a
> good idea. I am really looking forward to seeing the rationale added
> to the PEP -- that's pretty much the last thing on my list that made
> me hesitate. I'll leave the details of exactly how the parent path is
> referenced up to the implementation team (several good points were
> made), as long as the restriction that sys.path must be modified in
> place is lifted.
I've updated the PEP. Let me know how it looks.
I have not updated the implementation yet. I'm not exactly sure how I'm
going to convert from a path list of unknown origin to ('sys', 'path')
or ('foo', '__path__'). I'll look at it later tonight to see if it's
possible. I'm hoping it doesn't require major surgery to
importlib._bootstrap.
I still owe PEP updates for finder/loader examples and nested namespace
package examples. But I think that's all that's needed.
Eric.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
