On 04.06.12 00:28, Nick Coghlan wrote:
...
Backwards compatibility constraints mean we simply can't do that.
However, as noted above, it may make sense to provide more ways for
embedding applications to selectively access the behaviour through the
C API.

Why that???
I don't see this.
If you have a new python version with a new file that has-to-be-there,
what is then the problem? The new version carries the new file, so I
don't see a compatibility issue, because this version does not want
to be backward-compatible. It just introduces the new file constraint,
and it produces what it needs.

Am I somehow blinded, maybe?

(yes, you all know that I am, so please be patient with me) -- Chris

--
Christian Tismer             :^)<mailto:tis...@stackless.com>
tismerysoft GmbH             :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121     :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14482 Potsdam                :     PGP key ->  http://pgp.uni-mainz.de
work +49 173 24 18 776  mobile +49 173 24 18 776  fax n.a.
PGP 0x57F3BF04       9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619  305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
      whom do you want to sponsor today?   http://www.stackless.com/

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to