2012/6/14 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com>: > I like the idea of a kind attribute, I don't like the current names for the > possible values. > > At the very least, "positional only" needs to be supported to handle > nameless parameters in C functions (or those that unpack *args internally) > > The level of abbreviation used also seems unnecessary and internally > inconsistent. > > My proposal: > POSITIONAL- positional only > NAMED_POSITIONAL - normal parameter
Probably POSITIONAL should be the normal one, and there should be ONLY_POSITIONAL for the weirdos. -- Regards, Benjamin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
