-1 implemented It appears to target the problem of platform-dependent parameters. However as was discussed previously, much more common than a parameter simply not being supported on a platform is a parameter supporting different values on different platforms. As such, I think that it solves too small a sub-set of the problem that it attacks to be useful. Raising exceptions solves the problem.
Furthermore, whether a parameter is implemented or not is not properly a part of the callable's signature. It's a part of the function's internals. On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> wrote: > On 06/15/2012 12:50 PM, Yury Selivanov wrote: > > Open questions: > > 1. Should we keep 'Parameter.implemented' or not. *Please vote* > > > +1 to keeping Parameter.implemented. > > Let's get this over with, > > > /arry > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/alexandre.zani%40gmail.com > _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
