Cool. On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote:
> On 6/18/2012 11:12 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > >> Ok, banning ru"..." and ur"..." altogether is fine too (assuming it's >> fine with the originators of the PEP). >> > > The original PEP never proposed ur or ru , only u/U. > > It turns out that ur is problematical even in 2.x, as its meaning is > changed by the future import. 2&3 code should skip the convenience of the r > prefix and just use u and doubled \s. The PEP should probably say that. > > -- > Terry Jan Reedy > > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/python-dev<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev> > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/**mailman/options/python-dev/** > guido%40python.org<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org> > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
