Am 24.06.2012 01:11, schrieb Larry Hastings: > On 06/23/2012 03:08 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >> On 23.06.2012 23:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >>> Perhaps something more user-friendly than the hexversion? >> Please propose something. I think the hexversion *is* user-friendly, > > +1 to the idea, and specifically to using hexversion here.
+1 for the general idea and for using Py_LIMITED_API. I still like my idea of a simple macro based on Include/patchlevel.h, for example: #define Py_API_VERSION(major, minor, micro) \ (((major) << 24) | ((minor) << 16) | ((micro) << 8)) #if Py_LIMITED_API+0 >= Py_API_VERSION(3, 3, 0) #endif > (Though what will we do after Python 255.0?) Luckily it's gonna take another 1500 years, or so. Our progenies could rename Python to Circus ... _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
