As long as we are _before_ feature freeze, I would have thought it fine. Also, I'm sure we could allow ourselves some flexibility, after all, it is we that make these schedules, not the other way round.
But no matter. Condition variable wakeup has been sluggish for many years, I'm sure our users can wait a few more. Meanwhile, the patch is there for those who want it. Cheers, K ________________________________________ Frá: python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames....@python.org [python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames....@python.org] fyrir hönd Antoine Pitrou [solip...@pitrou.net] Sent: 23. júní 2012 12:37 To: python-dev@python.org Efni: Re: [Python-Dev] 3.3 release plans On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 12:32:37 +0000 Kristján Valur Jónsson <krist...@ccpgames.com> wrote: > Au contraire, it is actually a very major improvement, the result of pretty > extensive profiling, see > http://blog.ccpgames.com/kristjan/2012/05/25/optimizing-python-condition-variables-with-telemetry/ It might be. But to evaluate it, we have to digest a long technical blog post, then carefully review the patch (and perhaps even re-do some measurements). You understand that it's not reasonable to do so just one day before feature freeze. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/kristjan%40ccpgames.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
