On 23.06.2012 17:58, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:55:24 +0200 > mar...@v.loewis.de wrote: >>> That's true. I would have hoped for it to be recognized only when >>> there's at least one module or package inside, but it doesn't sound >>> easy to check for (especially in the recursive namespace packages case >>> - is that possible?). >> >> Yes - a directory becomes a namespace package by not having an __init__.py, >> so the "namespace package" case will likely become the default, and people >> will start removing the empty __init__.pys when they don't need to support >> 3.2- anymore. > > Have you tested the performance of namespace packages compared to > normal packages?
No, I haven't. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
