On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:16:45 +0300
Petri Lehtinen <pe...@digip.org> wrote:
> Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > > If messages were only added, a new file is no longer created and
> > > renamed over the old file when flush() is called on an mbox, MMDF or
> > > Babyl mailbox.
> > 
> > Why so? Appending is not atomic and, if it fails in the middle, you
> > could get a corrupt mbox file.
> > Furthermore, I disagree that it's a bugfix: IMO it should wait for 3.4.
> 
> The code previosly already appended messages to the end of the file
> when calling add(). This patch just changed it to not do a full
> rewrite when flush() is called.

Ok, I agree it sounds good then. Thanks for explaining.

Regards

Antoine.


_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to