anatoly techtonik, 05.07.2012 21:41: > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> anatoly techtonik, 05.07.2012 15:36: >>> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Terry Reedy wrote: >>>> From Raymond's first message on http://bugs.python.org/issue6021 , add >>>> grouper: >>>> >>>> "This has been rejected before. >>> >>> I quite often see such arguments and I can't stand to repeat that >>> these are not arguments. It is good to know, but when people use that >>> as a reason to close tickets - that's just disgusting. >> >> The *real* problem is that people keep bringing up topics (and even spell >> them out in the bug tracker) without searching for existing discussions >> and/or tickets first. That's why those who do such a search (or who know >> what they are talking about anyway) close these tickets with the remark >> "this has been rejected before", instead of repeating an entire heap of >> arguments all over again to feed a discussion that would only lead to the >> same result as it did before, often several times before. > > Make the bloody FAQ and summarize this stuff? Why waste each others > time?
Yes, that is exactly the question. It takes time to write things up nicely. I mean, once someone has pointed out to you that this has been discussed before, you could just go, look it up (or search for it), and then put it into a Wiki or blog post yourself, or sum it up and send it to the mailing list as a reply. Why rely on others to do it for you? Stefan _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com