On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:19:55 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > There are no provisions for infinite iterators, that is not within the > > scope of > > this proposal. > > I'll repeat my observation that remaining silent on this point is > effectively identical to blessing the practice of raising an exception > in __length_hint__ to force fast failure of attempts to convert an > infinite iterator to a concrete container.
And I'll repeat that it is false ;) Being silent is certainly not the same thing as blessing a non-existent practice. Regards Antoine. -- Software development and contracting: http://pro.pitrou.net _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
