Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > It does place a constraint on consumers that they can't assume those > fields will be NULL just because they didn't ask for them, but I'm > struggling to think of any reason why a client would actually *check* > that instead of just assuming it.
Can we continue this discussion some other time, perhaps after 3.3 is out? I'd like to respond, but need a bit more time to think about it than I have right now (for this issue). Stefan Krah _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
