On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Donald Stufft <donald.stu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 at 10:43 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > > I'm happy for PyPI to host such a registry. A specificaion for the > registry should be part of the PEP for the 1.3 format, but I would > propose this structure (without having researched in detail what > other registries feature, but with a rough idea what IANA registries > typically include): > > PyPI packages itself could serve as a registry, but I like the idea of > a separate registry better in many ways because it lets you divorce > the namespace from the package. The question being would this > be a x-registered-name type system or a registered-namespace-* > type system?
Please, don't. The software and infrastructure to run PyPI exists. Some level of namespacing makes sense to separate out extension management to different groups of people, but creating a whole management application just for this would be serious overkill. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
