On 20/09/12 22:59, Mark Dickinson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Nick Coghlan<ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 for using the unqualified "argument" in these error messages to
mean "positional or keyword argument" (inspect.Parameter spells it out
as POSITIONAL_OR_KEYWORD, but the full phrase is far too verbose for
an error message).
Ah yes; I see that 'positional or keyword' is a more accurate term
(but agree it's unwieldy for an error message). I also see that I was
naive to think that the 'fix' is as simple as dropping the word
'positional':
>>> def f(a, *, b):
... pass
...
>>> f()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in<module>
TypeError: f() missing 1 required positional argument: 'a'
If the word 'positional' were dropped here, it would give the
incorrect impression that f only requires one argument.
I don't expect error messages to give a complete catalog of every
problem with a specific function call. If f() reports that required
argument 'a' is missing, that does not imply that no other required
arguments are also missing. I think it is perfectly acceptable to
not report the missing 'b' until the missing 'a' is resolved.
But I do expect error messages to be accurate. +1 to remove the
word "positional" from the message.
--
Steven
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
