On 29 September 2012 06:51, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Wow! I had no idea cdecimal was that close in speed to float. That's > seriously impressive. >
If those numbers are similar in other benchmarks, would it be accurate and/or reasonable to include a statement along the lines of: "comparable to float performance - usually no more than 3x for calculations within the range of numbers covered by float" or is there not enough evidence to conclude that? Substitute suitable factor for 3x. Obviously
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
