On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 09:52:09 -0500 Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+py...@gmail.com> wrote: > > My thought was that it's better to have *something* always available, > that has a decent chance of being "good enough" in a lot of cases (and > if it's good enough for you, just silence the warning), than to > noisily fail because we can't provide a perfect solution due to > political idiocy. Or worse, to *silently* be wrong because someone > assumed we had provided a perfect solution without looking too hard.
We can, and should, mention potential pitfalls in the documentation. But I don't think a warning is warranted, anymore than for other known issues (there are many of them at http://bugs.python.org/ :-)). Regards Antoine. -- Software development and contracting: http://pro.pitrou.net _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
