Will add that the order is not significant. It is essentially a multidict.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:45 PM, <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote: > I'd like to request that PEP 426 is extended to talk about the order of > fields. > In particular, for the Extension field, is it necessary that all "additional > tags" > follow immediately the respective Extension field? > > I also request that RFC 2119 terminology is followed strictly. In > particular, > the phrasing "Additional tags defined by the extension should be of the form > string/Name:" > is unclear - under what "particular circumstances" can I deviate from that > requirement, i.e. use some form other than string/Name? > > Regards, > Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/dholth%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
