On 10/18/2012 08:02 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
With the 3.4 release PEP published using a traditional schedule,
perhaps MvL would care to do the honours as BDFL-Delegate in rejecting
the two "faster release cycle for the standard library" PEPs?
(I know I asked to hold off on that when MvL last brought it up, but
I've since realised that "do the first alpha early" isn't a
stand-alone PEP, it's just a matter of convincing Larry it's
worthwhile and negotiating timing with the release team after there
are some release-worthy features on trunk)
FWIW I don't think those peps should be rejected simply because I didn't
follow either for the 3.4 release schedule. I think they should both
have their day in the court of public opinion. (Of course, maybe that
day has already passed.)
//arry/
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
