Am 21.10.12 17:32, schrieb Christian Heimes:
Am 21.10.2012 17:23, schrieb antoine.pitrou:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ce9c9cbd1b11
changeset: 79875:ce9c9cbd1b11
user: Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net>
date: Sun Oct 21 17:21:04 2012 +0200
summary:
Build the _sha3 module with VS 2008.
For VS 2010 I decided against this approach and built the extension as a
separate .pyd extension because the _sha3 module is rather large (> 200
kB). I think your change is going to break VS 2010.
What do the other think? Should the code by built-in by default?
It's a packaging and maintenance issue. If it is in pythonxy.dll, the
project file becomes easier to maintain. That's why I was always opposed
to splitting up the existing pythonxy.dll into many project files.
OTOH, when adding a module, a decision can be made based on size (e.g.);
if the module depends on extra libraries, it shouldn't be in
pythonxy.dll.
For VS 2008, I don't care - this set of project files isn't really
intended for production use, but rather for ongoing development.
In the long term, I wish we could use the platform implementations
of SHA-3 rather than shipping our own.
Regards,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
