You could just include a different algorithm. He meant that the speed of ed25519 is not an advantage in this use case. Did I mention that its c implementation has defense against timing attacks? On Oct 22, 2012 8:24 PM, "Stephen J. Turnbull" <step...@xemacs.org> wrote:
> mar...@v.loewis.de writes: > > > Instead, the primary reason for not choosing cryptography is > ease-of-use. > > > > For that reason, I still think that using an established algorithm would > > be the better choice. > > I don't understand this. An established algorithm might be > cryptographically safer, but what could be easier to use than the > default algorithm that is built-in? > >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
