Am 29.10.2012 05:05, schrieb Brian Curtin: > I just found out that PEP 430 came up again and was approved, but only > because of another website. After that I looked back through my email > only to find mention via python-checkins. Aren't PEPs typically acted > on here on python-dev?
Yes, that's why I cross-posted the acceptance email here. > I mention this because I was writing up a blog.python.org post about > the (somewhat recent) Sphinx theme change and the change to add a > version dropdown which was pushed yesterday. I was about to wrap it up > and schedule it for tomorrow when I found out about 430, which I'm now > including. > > > note: I have no problems with that PEP actually being approved. I've > wanted that change for 2 years. For most PEPs, a longer contemplation and discussion period is of course required. But in this case I don't think a PEP would have been required anyway, and it matched more or less what was already discussed this time *and* the last time this came up (at which time I didn't act on it). So it seemed the best course of action to do it right now. Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
