On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 16:45:54 -0500 > Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > > > > > +1 for getting this into 3.4. Does it need a PEP, or just a bug > > > tracker item + code review? I think the latter is fine -- it's > > > probably better not to do too much bikeshedding but just to let Larry > > > propose a patch, have it reviewed and submitted, and then iterate. > > > It's also okay if it is initially used for only a subset of extension > > > modules (and even if some functions/methods can't be expressed using > > > it yet). > > > > > > > I don't see a need for a PEP either; code review should be plenty since > > this doesn't change how the outside world views public APIs. And we can > > convert code iteratively so that shouldn't hold things up either. > > I think the DSL itself does warrant public exposure. It will be an > element of the CPython coding style, if its use becomes widespread. > That's what the issue will tease out, so this isn't going in without some public scrutiny. But going through python-ideas for this I think is a bit much. I mean we don't clear every change to PEP 7 or 8 with the public and that directly affects people as well in terms of coding style.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
