On 29 Dec, 2012, at 5:48, Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Ronald Oussoren <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 28 Dec, 2012, at 21:23, Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Happy Holidays! Here is the update of PEP 431 with the changes that emerged > > after the earlier discussion. > > Why is the new timezone support added in a submodule of datetime? > > Because several people wanted it that way and nobody objected. > > Adding the new > function and exception to datetime itself wouldn't clutter the API that much > > It will make the datetime.py twice as long though, and the second longest > module in the stdlib, beaten only by decimal.py. Perhaps this is not a > problem. The module could be split into several modules in a package without affecting the public API if that would help with maintenance, simular to unittest. Ronald
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
