-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/10/2013 02:55 PM, Charles-François Natali wrote:
> Indeed, it should be really rare. *Lots* of applications make use of POSIX semantics for fork() / exec(). > There are far more programs that are bitten by FD inheritance upon > exec than programs relying on it, and whereas failures and security > issues in the first category are hard to debug and unpredictable > (especially in a multi-threaded program), Can someone please point to a writeop of the security issues involved? Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDwMtsACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7e7QCfdc1yxE+1iF6Gf/O9reOxStIG V8YAoKs79z5DHA3dyTDI+9yWkSSW0VD6 =9FVK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
