On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 21:56:06 +0100, Ralf Schmitt <r...@systemexit.de> wrote: > "R. David Murray" <rdmur...@bitdance.com> writes: > > > On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:42:59 +0100, Ralf Schmitt <r...@systemexit.de> wrote: > >> Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> writes: > >> > >> > It's like calling socket.settimeout(0.1) and then complaining that > >> > urllib.urlopen() raises exceptions > >> > >> but that's not what's happening. you'll see urllib.urlopen raising > >> exceptions and only afterwards realize that you called into some third > >> party library code that decided to change the timeout. > > > > What is stopping some some third party library code from calling > > socket.settimeout(0.1)? > > Nothing. That's the point. You just wonder why urlopen fails when the > global timeout has been changed by that third party library.
Oh, you were agreeing with Guido? I guess I misunderstood. --David _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com