Simon Cross <hodgestar+pythondev <at> gmail.com> writes: > For the record, all the reasons listed at [1] appear trivial.
In Bento's author's own words - "Weak documentation", "Mediocre code quality", "at a lower level, a lot of code leaves to be desired" may be trivial if David is just being self-deprecating, but what if he isn't? Or perhaps that part of the page is out of date, and needs updating? I can certainly agree with the "Weak documentation" part of the assessment, but this makes it hard to assess the package as a whole. Note that I'm not sniping - writing good documentation is hard work. Regards, Vinay Sajip _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
