On 26 Feb, 2013, at 16:13, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I would like to discuss on the language summit a potential inclusion
> of cffi[1] into stdlib.
The API in general looks nice, but I do have some concens w.r.t. including cffi
in the stdlib.
1. Why is cffi completely separate from ctypes, instead of layered on top of
it? That is, add a utility module to ctypes that can parse C declarations and
generate the right ctypes definitions.
2. Cffi has a dependencies on pycparser and that module and its dependencies
would therefore also be added to the stdlib (even if they'd be hidden in the
cffi package)
3. Cffi basicly contains a (limited) C parser, and those are notoriously hard
to get exactly right. Luckily cffi only needs to interpret declarations and not
the full language, but even so this can be a risk of subtle bugs.
4. And finally a technical concern: how well does cffi work with fat binaries
on OSX? In particular, will the distutils support generate cached data for all
architectures supported by a fat binary?
Also, after playing around with it for 5 minutes I don't quite understand how
to use it. Let's say I want to wrap a function "CGPoint CGPointMake(CGFloat x,
CGFloat y)". Is is possible to avoid mentioning the exact typedef for CGFloat
somewhere? I tried using:
ffi.cdef("typedef ... CGFloat; typedef struct { CGFloat x; CGFloat y; }
CGPoint; CGPoint CGPointMake(CGFloat x, CGFloat y);")
But that results in an error when calling verify:
TypeError: field 'struct $CGPoint.x' has ctype 'struct $CGFloat' of unknown
size
>From a first glance this doesn't seem to buy me that much w.r.t. ctypes, I
>still have to declare the actual type of CGFloat which is documented as "some
>floating point type".
Ronald
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
