On Feb 28, 2013, at 7:23 AM, Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote:
> Le Thu, 28 Feb 2013 06:57:36 -0500, > Jesse Noller <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >> On Feb 28, 2013, at 6:55 AM, Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Le Thu, 28 Feb 2013 06:48:24 -0500, >>> Jesse Noller <[email protected]> a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps it's an idea to have a python-legal mailing list for these >>>>> topics? >>>>> >>>>> I don't think it's fundamentally wrong to scrutinize licenses, >>>>> provided that the discussion stays civil and factual. >>>>> >>>>> IIRC Debian has such a list because people got annoyed with the >>>>> traffic on other lists. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Stefan Krah >>>> >>>> We have one: [email protected] >>> >>> That's not exactly a public mailing-list. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Antoine. >> >> Nope. But it's also where lawyers flock and these issues can rapidly >> be resolved. > > Really? I didn't know lawyers flocked at the PSF. It also doesn't > provide any public feedback for said "resolution", meaning it doesn't > help alleviate any future discussions about legal issues. > > Regards > > Antoine. > Yes sir. Ill have a new mailing list made today. I will note on the list page that is is strictly unofficial and all legal / lawyer type things must be sent to [email protected] for official decisions or legal counsel. > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jnoller%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
