On 5 Mar 2013, at 00:23, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net> wrote:
> On 5 March 2013 13:21, Michael Foord <fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk> wrote: >> > >> We can certainly talk about it - although as Guido says, something specific >> may be easier to have a useful discussion about. >> >> Reading through your blog articles it seemed like a whole lot of subunit >> context was required to understand the specific >> proposal you're making for the TestResult. It also *seems* like you're >> redesigning the TestResult for a single use case >> (distributed testing) with an api that looks quite "odd" for anything that >> isn't that use case. I'd rather see how we can >> make the TestResult play *better* with those requirements. That discussion >> probably belongs in another thread - or at >> the summit. > > Right - all I wanted was to flag that you and I and any other > interested parties should discuss this at the summit :). I've added a testing topic to the agenda. At the very least you could outline your streaming test result proposal, or kick off a meta discussion. We'll probably time limit the discussion so some specific focus will make it more productive - or maybe you can get a feel for how open to major changes in this area other python devs are. Michael > > -Rob > > > > > > > -- > Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> > Distinguished Technologist > HP Cloud Services -- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
